“Your Dog is a True Philosopher”

I’m rereading Plato’s Republic for a little consolation during this time.

I had forgotten the passage about the philosopher dog in Book Two. Here is the passage about the need for guardians to be both gentle with friends and dangerous to enemies from Jowett’s translation:

A difficulty by no means easy to overcome, he replied. 
Whereas, I said, they ought to be dangerous to their enemies, and gentle to their friends; if not, they will destroy themselves without waiting for their enemies to destroy them. 

True, he said. 
What is to be done then? I said; how shall we find a gentle nature which has also a great spirit, for the one is the contradiction of the other? 

True. 
He will not be a good guardian who is wanting in either of these two qualities; and yet the combination of them appears to be impossible; and hence we must infer that to be a good
guardian is impossible. 

I am afraid that what you say is true, he replied. 
Here feeling perplexed I began to think over what had preceded. My friend, I said, no wonder that we are in a perplexity; for we have lost sight of the image which we had before us.
 

What do you mean? he said. 
I mean to say that there do exist natures gifted with those opposite qualities

And where do you find them? 
Many animals, I replied, furnish examples of them; our friend the dog is a very good one: you know that well-bred dogs are perfectly gentle to their familiars and acquaintances, and the reverse to strangers. 

Yes, I know. 
Then there is nothing impossible or out of the order of nature in our finding a guardian who has a similar combination of qualities? 

Certainly not. 
Would not he who is fitted to be a guardian, besides the spirited nature, need to have the qualities of a philosopher? 

I do not apprehend your meaning. 
The trait of which I am speaking, I replied, may be also seen in the dog, and is remarkable in the animal.
 

What trait? 
Why, a dog, whenever he sees a stranger, is angry; when an acquaintance, he welcomes him, although the one has never done him any harm, nor the other any good. Did this never strike you as curious? 

The matter never struck me before; but I quite recognise the truth of your remark. 

And surely this instinct of the dog is very charming; –your dog is a true philosopher

Why? 
Why, because he distinguishes the face of a friend and of an enemy only by the criterion of knowing and not knowing. And must not an animal be a lover of learning who determines what he likes and dislikes by the test of knowledge and ignorance? 

Most assuredly. 
And is not the love of learning the love of wisdom, which is philosophy? 

Your dog is a true philosopher!

Told ya.!

There is consolation, to be sure, in philosophy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s